All Posts - Blogs and Ebooks

The moment we perceive danger, tension surges into the neck and the shoulders lift toward the ears. The body contracts around the throat. It happens instantly, before thought ever enters the equation.

Trial lawyers love facts. Jurors love stories. And the verdict is rendered by jurors—not lawyers.

On December 14, 1959, C. S. Lewis wrote a short letter to a schoolgirl in America who had asked for advice on writing. His eight simple rules were practical, unsentimental, and timeless.

Trial lawyers are storytellers first and technicians second. Jurors do not experience a trial as a stack of briefs or a checklist of elements—they experience it as movement: moments of tension and release, advance and retreat, imbalance and resolution.

Jurors do not just listen to lawyers—they watch them. Long before a jury consciously evaluates your argument, their brains are already making credibility judgments based on movement, posture, and gesture.

Quick Series Primer (For the Uninitiated) The Lincoln Lawyer (Netflix) follows Los Angeles criminal defense attorney Mickey Haller, who famously runs his law practice out of the backseat of his Lincoln Continental.

In the courtroom, speech is never merely verbal—it is physical, psychological, and decisional.

Premise: Assume Joe Goldberg—the obsessive, lethal protagonist of You—has been charged with all known killings, convicted after trial, and now stands before the court for sentencing.

In Acting for Lawyers, trial attorney and trained actor Michael DeBlis III, Esq. reveals how the core tools of professional actors—

Trial lawyers love courtroom dramas for the same reason jurors do: conflict, control, and revelation.

Trial lawyers are trained extensively in speaking—opening statements, examinations, objections, and closing arguments. Far less attention is paid to listening.

Below are practical examples showing how each type of listening directly shapes the very next cross-examination question. These are moments where disciplined listening—not scripted questions—creates leverage.

Sentencing is often the most consequential phase of a criminal case. Long after questions of guilt have been resolved—by plea or verdict—the sentencing hearing determines how much of your client’s life, liberty, and future will be taken by the State.

In the courtroom, speech is never just words—it is action.

This is the sequel to, “When Words Become Action: The Physical Power of Speech in the Courtroom.”

Hermogenes’ Seven Styles describe distinct energetic qualities of speech. In the courtroom, these become strategic tools for shaping juror perception, guiding emotion, and controlling meaning.

The classical styles of speech were not abstract theories but practical tools, long refined and tested for their persuasive power.

Every trial lawyer knows the truth:  the real fight happens long before the jury files into the box.  The pre-trial phase is where narratives are shaped, leverage is built, and outcomes quietly take form. Trials may provide the drama, but pre-trial work provides the power. In New Jersey’s Superior Court system—much like across the country—the path from arrest to trial is a labyrinth of decisions, deadlines, and strategic crossroads. What follows is a practical, stage-by-stage

Every trial lawyer remembers their first jury trial—not because they were brilliant, composed, or in complete control, but because they weren’t. Nothing prepares you for the first time twelve strangers walk into a jury box and look to  you  to make sense of a story filled with conflict, ambiguity, and consequences. A jury trial is not just a sequence of stages; it is a living organism. It breathes. It reacts. It changes tempo. It tests you. And if you don’t understand its ana

The part of you that wants to  show  and to  impress  the jury is scared. Those same thoughts that race through an actor’s mind— What if I fail? What if they hate me? Am I good enough? —live inside every trial lawyer before they rise to speak. Fear is an ever-present companion in performance, whether on stage or in court. The paradox, of course, is that the fears that paralyze us rarely come true. In advocacy, as in acting, fear tempts us to  perform  rather than  be . It dri